Weekly Change #2: cleaning and tidying up the house

March 8th, 2010

Here comes week #2 (actually, week #3, since I just repeated the first week during the second one), which I really can’t put off any longer, though I’d like to. :) The change is this: each day, make sure my home ends up noticeably better than it started. I’m thinking about focusing on one room each day.

About the “noticeably better”: it doesn’t mean that it has to end up perfect, but, on the other hand, cleaning a square centimeter of the floor doesn’t count. :)

A bit of background: I’m really disorganized, and don’t really have a problem with living “amidst chaos”, but, of course, this means that I can’t have visits at home, organize my usual Sunday lunches, and so on. On the other hand, I really have a problem with tidying up and cleaning; much like exercising, these are activities I find utterly, mind-numbingly boring, as they don’t occupy my mind at all, but still need some active attention; even really doing nothing would be better, as without such a demand for attention I could simply let my mind wander.

Still, life isn’t made of only pleasant activities, and I really must do something about my “lair”. Therefore, I came up with this plan. If I spend, say, 10-15 minutes each day improving the condition of one room, in a couple of weeks the house will be good enough to have visitors again — without the insanity, the horror :) of, say, spending an entire weekend doing nothing but this.

A quick update

March 2nd, 2010

Some changes in my life happened since last Friday, and some more things are about to change in the near future, so this week is probably not a good one to implement the second “weekly change”, not to mention that I’m already a couple of days late since the beginning of the week.

I’m proud to say, though, that I’ve been sticking to the first change, and feeling much better (details to come) because of that.

More to come in the following days…

Weekly Change #1: no alcohol except on social occasions

February 24th, 2010

And no, “social occasions” don’t include going to my family’s for dinner, or having friends or family at home who are not currently drinking.

As I said last post, I’ve already started this one, last Monday. This should be mostly easy… for a while.

The problem is not that I “crave” alcohol, as an alcoholic would do; the problem is that I seem to have got it into my head, since years ago, that a great meal needs a great wine (or an average one, if a great one is not affordable), and that I need alcohol in my system to enjoy several types of situations — typically social ones.

Of course, that’s a dependency — even if not a physical one –, which makes it a very, very bad idea. I must be able to both enjoy a good meal and enjoy myself with either friends or strangers without having to drink a couple of glasses first.

Besides, without drinking I sleep much better, and feel much more awake during the day. The days even seem longer — which may actually have been one of my reasons for drinking, since I often feel like time passes too slowly, which obviously causes boredom. But making the days “become” shorter is absolutely the wrong way to solve that; if I need more things to do so that I don’t get bored, that’s what I should search for — or create.

Starting over / New plan

February 24th, 2010

Yes, I’m back. Hopefully, for good. :) I’ve been mostly focused on another subject recently, but it’s time to restart my self-improvement… as there’s currently a lot to improve, and life hasn’t been good. But it’s important to keep a positive attitude, and, most importantly, a sense of humor, right?

So, for the past couple of days, I’ve been thinking about a way to not only start developing and improving myself again, but also to “liven up” this blog. The first problem was the hardest: I tend to be very lazy, and it’s hard for me to keep doing something for a very long while without getting bored, so quicker results and variety are a must. Also, tackling a lot of areas at once, coming from a long period of doing nothing about them, doesn’t usually work. “Baby steps” are often a better way.

The plan I came up with is this: each week I will introduce a change (for the better, of course) in my life. Sticking with something for just a week is easy. The trick is that in the following week, when I introduce another change (probably in a completely different area), I will stick to the first change as well — though the new one will be the main focus of that week.

Changes I’ve already thought about, in no particular order:

  • Don’t drink alcohol except on social occasions (and no, dining at my family’s doesn’t count as one here)
  • Meet at least one new person
  • Go vegan for a day or two each week
  • Fast for a day or two each week
  • Exercise at least 5-10 minutes each day
  • Read a book not from my usual genres (a week should be more than enough)
  • Look at everyone in the eyes when talking (harder for me than it sounds)
  • Make sure my home ends up tidier and cleaner after each day of the week (much saner than spending an entire day or two doing nothing but that)
  • Go to some new place and explore it a bit (difficult at the moment due to lack of money, but eventually possible)
  • Do something each day to try to increase the money earned from my sites
  • Find (and put in practice) a new way of spending less money, either for the week or for the entire month
  • Do some kind of “good deed” each day, however minor — not to gain something from it (and certainly not for supernatural reasons, as I’m 100% atheist), but simply to make the world a (slightly) better place
  • Seek out friends and family (perhaps a different one each day) without any ulterior reasons (note that I consider “enjoying their company” an ulterior reason, which doesn’t mean it’s a bad one)
  • and more…

Again, these are just ideas I’m throwing around; don’t think of the above as some kind of “checklist”. I may use some of them, not use others, and add new ones.

I’m also going to avoid being too “rigid”; I’ll stick to the first week of every change no matter what, but if it proves too difficult afterwards, I may put that particular change on hold after that week, though with the intention of trying again later. Still, this should be the exception, not the rule.

Post about the first weekly change (which has already started, this monday) coming next…

On asking for help

October 1st, 2009

Since I was a kid, there were two pieces of knowledge regarding the idea of asking for help that I’ve believed in. To me, they make sense, are logical, and should never be a source of conflict. They are:

  1. Asking for help is OK and normal;
  2. Saying “no” to that is also OK and normal.

Unfortunately, in my adult life, I’ve been finding out — often to my own detriment, and sometimes with irrevocable damage to relationships — that a lot of people seem to believe the exact opposite. They never ask for help (except perhaps to their close family, and even then they feel terrible about it), and become shocked — and offended, and/or hurt — when asked.

Apparently, when person A ask person B for help, person B has two choices: either feel terrible for not helping, or feel terrible with him/herself (and resent the other person) for not being strong enough to say “no”. There are no other possibilities, it seems. Helping is something terrible, which harms the helper immensely, but saying “no” also makes the would-be helper feel like a monster; therefore, the asker committed a hideous sin just by asking, as if he or she ignored an unspoken rule or protocol: “thou shalt not ask”.

Am I so weird for believing that there’s nothing wrong with either asking or refusing? That we’re all in this together, that there should be no forbidden subjects between friends or more, that if one can’t or doesn’t feel like he/she should help, it’s perfectly OK?

I’ve seen this phenomenon for more than a decade (hi, ex-wife), and even this week I’ve talked to several people who absolutely and completely disagree with me (asking is infinitely wrong and even abusive, because it “forces” the askee to either sacrifice him/herself or feel like a heartless monster, and so on). Is this widespread? Or just a part of Portuguese culture? Anyone from outside Portugal want to share their thoughts?

Back in business

September 23rd, 2009

As you may have noticed, I have (until yesterday) been absent from this blog for several months. The reason is, unfortunately, a common one in my life: laziness. Several other things have also changed in my life, such as having a girlfriend (since May), but that was not the reason. It’s always the same: laziness, and inertia.

Anyone who’s ever tried a diet or an exercise regimen, unless possessing superhuman willpower, certainly knows what it’s like. Everything is going well, then you skip a day (of dieting, of exercising, of sticking to some other decision). You feel ashamed and guilty, so the next day you’re back in force. But the next time you skip a day, you don’t feel so guilty. It becomes more and more acceptable, more common. And soon your self-improvement is a thing of the past.

A couple of days ago, however, I was thinking about life in general, and after a while I remembered not only what I did during the beginning of this blog, but how I felt then. And the latter is the most important part here: I felt great. Not only was I more active and “awake”, both physically and mentally, but I also, for the first time in a very long time, felt really proud of myself, felt I was doing something about my life, for a change.

It was a great feeling. And I want it back.

I’ve already implemented a few changes today, and tomorrow I’ll write about them here. I’m still at the very beginning, so I don’t really feel “different”… except for one thing. I’m doing something.

And that’s always better than not doing anything.

Tomorrow

September 22nd, 2009

‘Nuff said.

;)

No, I’m not dead. :)

June 5th, 2009

And no, I’ve not either completed, or given up on, my personal development.

I’m going on holidays for the next two weeks, and when I get back I’ll “get serious” again. Both in terms of development, and in terms of writing here.

But now, it’s the mountains for me, for a while. :)

“Radical Honesty”, and being a jerk

April 27th, 2009

Reader Sara sent me a link to this article, which, despite the title (“I Think You’re Fat”), has absolutely nothing to do with weight or health. Instead, it’s about a movement called Radical Honesty. I’ll quote the article:

The movement was founded by a sixty-six-year-old Virginia-based psychotherapist named Brad Blanton. He says everybody would be happier if we just stopped lying. Tell the truth, all the time. This would be radical enough — a world without fibs — but Blanton goes further. He says we should toss out the filters between our brains and our mouths. If you think it, say it. Confess to your boss your secret plans to start your own company. If you’re having fantasies about your wife’s sister, Blanton says to tell your wife and tell her sister. It’s the only path to authentic relationships. It’s the only way to smash through modernity’s soul-deadening alienation. Oversharing? No such thing.

Now, in one way, this makes a lot of sense, to me. I’ve always valued honesty above almost everything – not just honesty to others, but to oneself –, and I’ve always thought that lying was a kind of cowardice: if you’re not afraid of the truth / reality, you don’t lie. I also enjoyed that the author of the movement, himself, doesn’t turn it into a religion-like absolute “commandment”, and uses a popular example to show what he means:

“I advocate never lying in personal relationships. But if you have Anne Frank in your attic and a Nazi knocks on the door, lie.”

However, the examples used by both Blanton and the article writer are, for the most part… how shall I put it? It seems that, to them, being honest amounts to simply being a jerk, and only lying prevents them from acting like complete assholes all the time.

Tangent: this reminds me of a common claim by religious believers: that non-believers are inherently immoral because, without belief in a god, there’s no reason for one to be moral. I find this both offensive and revealing: what they mean is that they see no reason to be moral, except for the desire of heaven or fear of hell. To them, without fear of God, we’d all be lying, cheating, raping, pillaging and killing each other. Maybe that’s what they’d do. The fact that other people are not like that is unthinkable to them. (Note: I’m not claiming that all believers are like this; in fact, many of them – probably the majority — find this argument as offensive and stupid as I do).

This is similar; both the author and Blanton seem to be implying, at least from their examples, that we’re all self-centered, self-absorbed, thoroughly unpleasant jerks, and only by lying can we act “nice” from time to time.

Can I be the only one to think that, you know, maybe, somehow, we can once in a while be genuinely nice?

One example the author gives is when an older man who had just lost his wife sent him some poems and asked him for his opinion. The author found the poems boring and below average, but didn’t have the heart to tell the old man so, and lied (“they’re very good, you should think about getting them published”). Yes, that was dishonest, though understandable. But are there really no alternatives other than to tell him “your poems suck, don’t quit your day job”?

What about telling him – honestly – what was wrong (and right) with the poems? How he should try to improve his writing? Suggest some classic examples for him to read? Tell him which part you thought was more promising? You know, actually be helpful without being either rude or patronizing? Maybe I’m weird, but that’s what I’d do (unless I really didn’t care about that person, but it’s obvious that the author did).

Or maybe I’m being naïve. Maybe brutal and complete honesty would turn most people into unbearable jerks. Maybe it’s only the constant white lies that allow people to live and function in society without either isolating themselves or getting at others’ throats all the time. But I still don’t think that’s the case, at least with most people.

A brief progress report

April 24th, 2009

Yes, I’ve been extremely lazy (and a bit busy) for the past two weeks or so. But no, I haven’t given up, much the opposite. :)

As of right now, I’m recovering from a flu I got from my father, when I visited his place last Tuesday. Apparently, they’re all recovering from it over there, too, so it wasn’t just me. Yesterday I slept about 3 hours in the afternoon (I had to leave work at about lunchtime), and 9 more hours at night, which is a lot for me; even before I got visibly sick (which was yesterday), I had been suffering from drowsiness for the last few days. Now I feel better, but I think it’s the medicine doing it; after all, a flu isn’t cured in a day.

I’ve been mostly fasting for two days each week (the trial is until the end of the month, after all), and it isn’t that hard. My weight seems to have stabilized at around 80 kg, but, then again, I haven’t exercised for the last two weeks. I’ll begin again next Monday, as long as the flu is really cured that day.

Anyway, I’ve been thinking about writing a different kind of articles on this blog (in addition to the normal ones, not as a replacement), because I love to think and to write about what I think. The themes will, of course, be related to this blog’s usual ones (self-improvement, personality, human relationships, and so on). I hope to write the first one later today.

Day 20: 4th day of fasting

April 6th, 2009

I had a pretty lousy weekend, which made me not really “behave” in terms of exercise and food. :( As I had mentioned before, there are other parts of my self-improvement I need to pay more attention to, other than my body; if I had already done so, then things like this wouldn’t have happened. This is something I’ll have to start tackling this week.

Anyway, this is my fourth day of fasting, after having just coffee and soy milk this morning. Next meal: tomorrow’s breakfast (or perhaps even lunch).

The only good part of this weekend was that I bought some new toys for my Senegal parrot, Kang, which he seems to be enjoying, and was able to spend more time with him; he seems to be getting used to me and doesn’t panic as much as he did. Sometimes I don’t know how people devoid of pets at home can handle the inevitable disappointments with other people…Kang (Senegal parrot)

Day 17: below 80 kg at last!

April 3rd, 2009

This morning, for the first time in at least 5 years, probably more, I weighed less than 80 kg (79.7 kg, in fact). Also for the first time, Wii Fit labeled my BMI as “ideal” instead of “overweight”, since it went below 25.0.

Intermittent fasting (IF), so far, works. And the best part is that, for the rest of the week, I can eat normally.

Like the previous two times, after 24 hours of fasting I wake up not feeling hungry; in fact, it’s 11 AM and I haven’t eaten anything solid yet (I will do so at lunch, of course).

I’m beginning to agree with the IF advocates when they say that the food and diet industry has convinced most of the Western world that “you need 6 meals a day”, that “being hungry is unbearable and bad for you”, that “if you go more than a couple of hours without eating you’ll feel weak and light-headed”, that “no way I could go an entire day without food; I’d faint”, and so on. I’m no expert (far from it – I’m a computer guy, not a nutritionist or a doctor), but, like I’ve said before, I have the “soul of a scientist”, and a scientist doesn’t take things on faith, or on “everybody knows”; I wanted to test things out for myself, and, so far, the results have been exactly the opposite of what “popular wisdom” tells me. In fact, they almost sound too good to be true.

As I said, I test things out; this is just my second week of IF, and my plan was to try this out for a month (until the end of April); if, in the end, I don’t feel as good as I do now, or I develop some health problem, I’ll stop, of course. But if I hadn’t done this, I’d never know, so, even if the test went badly, it would still have increased my knowledge, which is always a good thing. But, so far, so good.

Just for fun: have you thought about what would happen to the world’s economy if everyone in the world started eating just 5 days a week? Now that would be a crisis… so, naturally, there are vested interests in perpetuating the “need 6 meals a day, can’t ever feel hungry” belief.