Posts Tagged ‘Breakfast’

Trial #1 extended

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009

As my previous post suggested, I’ve decided to extend my “have breakfast” trial until next Sunday, making it last almost two weeks.

So far, I haven’t noticed any positive difference, although at least I don’t feel bloated and indisposed during the morning, like in the beginning of the trial. I’d guess that my body really doesn’t need breakfast, at least with the life I lead.

Trial #2 will start in the beginning of April, and will be based on fasting one or two days every week. Now that should be a big change… we’ll see if it works or not.

Third day

Friday, March 20th, 2009

Woke up before the alarm clock, which is always a good thing: it means I don’t spend the whole day like a zombie.

Breakfast: instant chicken-flavored noodles. Go on, call me crazy. :) Still feeling a bit full, but much less than yesterday, even though the actual quantity of matter eaten was mostly the same.

Exercise: after the usual sit-ups (ouch!), I did the “long running” exercise on Wii Fit, and tried out the recently unlocked boxing exercise. It’s actually much more like step aerobics than actual boxing, since the hard part is the patterns you have to do with your feet; the “boxing” part is simple, easy and not tiring. For exercise purposes, I’d guess the boxing event in Wii Sports is much better than Wii Fit’s.

Weight (according to Wii Fit): 81.4 kg, which is 0.3 kg more than yesterday. This is quite normal (and even Wii Fit says so), as weight fluctuates up and down even if you’re losing it in the long run; this is, in fact, why they say you shouldn’t weigh yourself every day. But since I know the reasons and am not emotionally affected by it, it’s OK. :) Besides, being a computer geek, I like looking at graphs. :)

Slightly nauseated :(

Thursday, March 19th, 2009

I don’t necessarily blame my first solid breakfast in months for it, but I’ve been feeling kind of nauseated since morning. The reason I don’t blame it is that, unlike, say, yesterday, when I woke up before the alarm clock and felt full of energy during the entire day, today I was woken up by the alarm, and I was still quite sleepy.

However, having that breakfast made me feel “bloated” during the entire morning, and I ate very little at lunch. Sadly, the “bloated” sensation hasn’t vanished yet, I’m still sleepy, and simply don’t feel well.

Well, a trial is a trial, so I will keep my promise and have a breakfast every day until Sunday. I’ll try something different tomorrow, perhaps. And, of course, I intend to eat very little at dinner (at my father’s) today.

Trial #1: having breakfast, for a change

Wednesday, March 18th, 2009

Because I claim to be relatively open-minded, and also because I love testing and learning things for myself, without either dismissing or believing them just because “everyone says so”, “it’s the accepted wisdom”, or even “that’s how it works for me”, I therefore announce (drum roll) that my first trial will be… to have a “normal” breakfast from tomorrow (Thursday) to at least Sunday.

It’s not a very long period of time, but I hope to see some difference. Will I “have more energy” during the morning (when I don’t feel any lack of it already)? Will it help, hinder or not affect my weight loss? Will I feel “better” in general, or notice no difference? Will I be more or less hungry at lunchtime?

See you (about this; the rest of the blog won’t stop) next Monday. :)

The breakfast challenge

Wednesday, March 18th, 2009

As a very good friend of mine commented on the previous post, I usually don’t have breakfast. I used to, when I was a child or a teen living with my grandmother, who prepared it for me (usually cereal), but I haven’t had that habit for years. In fact, I don’t understand how other people can even eat solid food just after getting out of bed; not only am I absolutely not hungry (until a few hours later), but the very idea of swallowing something solid feels… almost, but not quite, painful.

And yet, since childhood, I’ve been hearing and reading: “breakfast is the most important meal of the day.” My question is: why?

The idea I had, and still have, is that most people here would reply with one or more of the following:

  1. because you need energy / nutrients for the morning
  2. because otherwise you’ll be starving an hour or two later, and will probably snack on far less healthy food
  3. because otherwise you’ll be starving at lunch, and will then eat too much
  4. because not eating for so long a time is “bad” for you (why? how?)
  5. “I couldn’t do anything in the morning without it”
  6. because “the body needs it” (without any justification)
  7. “just because”
  8. “duh, everyone knows it”

Number 6 is circular logic, numbers 7 and 8 are childish, and 5 is a personal experience which doesn’t necessarily apply to everyone. 4 is unexplained, so it doesn’t really say anything. So what about the first three? Well, I can say that 2 and 3 really don’t apply to me; I never eat snacks in mid-morning, nor do I spend the entire morning craving food, nor am I starving at lunchtime. In fact, I think that the few times I did eat breakfast, I was actually more hungry at midday.

Energy… well, my current job is not very demanding, so maybe things would be different if it were, but I’m really not like many people I know, the “I can’t think or do anything until I’ve had breakfast and coffee” kind. This morning, without a real breakfast, I’ve exercised (while being completely out of shape), went to work, came back home for lunch, had a nice (not huge) green salad with bits of ham, and here I am at work again, not starving or feeling depleted.

Anyway, I googled for “why breakfast is important”, and read through the first five results. The justifications were always the first three on the list above, nothing more. Nope, that’s really not me.

Now, admittedly, I’m weird. :)

But, well, here’s a challenge to you: please tell me, in a comment, why having breakfast is important. The challenge is this: don’t use a variant of the above 8 answers. (Exception: if you can justify answer 4, it’s acceptable.) If you know of another good reason, please let me know. Links to nutritional / medical information are welcome.

Note that I’m not doubting accepted medical wisdom; I simply find the explanations I’ve found so far to be either non-explanatory, or not applying to me, as far as I can see. Which is why I’m asking  for a better explanation. I’m like this: I need to understand things, instead of accepting them on faith.

More about breakfast in the next post…